$$\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left<#1\right|}\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right>}\newcommand{\bk}[2]{\left<#1\middle|#2\right>}\newcommand{\bke}[3]{\left<#1\middle|#2\middle|#3\right>}$$
X
INFORMAÇÕES SOBRE DIREITOS AUTORAIS


As obras disponibilizadas nesta Biblioteca Digital foram publicadas sob expressa autorização dos respectivos autores, em conformidade com a Lei 9610/98.

A consulta aos textos, permitida por seus respectivos autores, é livre, bem como a impressão de trechos ou de um exemplar completo exclusivamente para uso próprio. Não são permitidas a impressão e a reprodução de obras completas com qualquer outra finalidade que não o uso próprio de quem imprime.

A reprodução de pequenos trechos, na forma de citações em trabalhos de terceiros que não o próprio autor do texto consultado,é permitida, na medida justificada para a compreeensão da citação e mediante a informação, junto à citação, do nome do autor do texto original, bem como da fonte da pesquisa.

A violação de direitos autorais é passível de sanções civis e penais.
Coleção Digital

Avançada


Estatísticas | Formato DC |



Título: REVISION IN WRITING AND COREFERENCE ISSUES
Autor: ENEIDA FIGUEIRA DE ALMEIDA WERNER
Instituição: PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO - PUC-RIO
Colaborador(es):  ERICA DOS SANTOS RODRIGUES - ADVISOR
Nº do Conteudo: 36163
Catalogação:  17/01/2019 Idioma(s):  PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL
Tipo:  TEXT Subtipo:  THESIS
Natureza:  SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION
Nota:  Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio.
Referência [pt]:  https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/colecao.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=36163@1
Referência [en]:  https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/colecao.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=36163@2
Referência DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.36163

Resumo:
The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to investigate the writing process and the process of establishing coreference as to how they are monitored by groups of different degrees of writing experience. The research is part of the study of writing processing, focusing on the production process, and is theoretically anchored in writing research related to the Cognitive Writing Model of Hayes and Flower (1980) and in Hayes s Writing Revision Model (1987). In the studies of coreference, we consider the main theories that investigate the influence of factors that favour accessibility to memory, Accessibility Theory (Ariel, 1990), the Centering Theory (Grosz, Joshi and Weinstein, 1995) and the Information Load Hypothesis (Almor, 1999). We related the theoretical questions to the data captured by means of experimental methodology. The laboratory used was LAPAL, at PUC-Rio. The experiments conducted were based on writing production and revision tasks and we used the technological tool of keystroke logging Inputlog (http://www.inputlog.net/) to record and analyse data. Participants were graduate and post graduate students of public and private institutions in Rio de Janeiro.In the first experiment the data analysed related to production of writing and coreference processing from image-stimuli of two comic strips without verbal material. Concerning the measures related to writing production, we analysed the relation between the process and product in terms of the number of characters and words as well as pauses and the types of revisions made. Regarding the measures of coreference processing, we examined the types of of referential expressions selected to introduce and to establish coreference within discourse entities, as well as data related to the moment when correferential elements were revised (immediate or delayed revisions) and the degree of specificity implied in the alterations worked out. The second experiment aimed to investigate the factors that influence the choice of anaphoric referential expressions from the type of information contained in the antecedent. We conducted an experiment of writing revision consisting of four different texts of the same discursive genre. In each of them we took into account the degree of activation in memory provided by information that favours accessibility to memory stored items. The independent variables were the syntactic function of the antecedent(more subject/less subject), the thematic role of the antecedent (more agent/less agent) and the the distance between the antecedent and the anaphoric referential expression (equal period/different period). Results from the first experiment pointed out differences between the types of revisions (immediate/delayed) and the proportion of revisions made (deletions/insertions) indicating that post-graduate group used more revision strategy resources while monitoring their production as compared to the group of graduates. In the second experiment, statistical analysis conducted for each group separately revealed effects of the factors considered as for syntactic position (in the 2 groups), thematic role (in the post-graduates group) and distance (in both groups). In addition, interaction effects between distance and syntactic position and between position, thematic role and distance (graduates group) and position and distance (post-graduates group) were significant. The quality of the revisions was proven diverse, having post-graduates proceeded to more delayed revisions that imply alteration in overall text quality than the group of graduates. As a whole, the experiments conducted allowed us to identify differences between the experimental groups and suggest evidence that schooling level plays an important role in writing and in the choices made in for coreference processing.

Descrição Arquivo
COMPLETE  PDF
Logo maxwell Agora você pode usar seu login do SAU no Maxwell!!
Fechar Janela



* Esqueceu a senha:
Senha SAU, clique aqui
Senha Maxwell, clique aqui