This dissertation analyzes four pieces of the so called literatura marginal or periférica, namely the works of authors Ferréz, Marcelino Freire, Rodrigo Ciríaco and Allan da Rosa. It focuses on the construction of a perspective that privileges the dialogue these works establish with two key notions: the multiple modern temporalities of the contemporaneity, which are characterized mainly by the variety of artistic representations that produce other forms of experiencing modernity - analyzed with the help of authors such as Homi Bhabha, Néstor García Canclini, Paul Gilroy e Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht -, and the notion of the wrong, as formulated by Jacques Rancière, whose approach will be helpful to understand the approximations that the aesthetic choices of the four authors have with the political realm. The wrong consists in the emergence of an unexpected identity-based collectivity within the community, altering the distribution of the sensible, forcing the community to redo its sites of production and of knowledge. By borrowing such notions, we defend that, since these works come from an untraditional place within Brazilian cultural production, they generate new perspectives that both approach and distance themselves from the literary habitus in Brazil, leading to a reevaluation of the contemporary Brazilian literary scene and even of the literary scenes of the past. Moreover, a couple of reflections on the main academic contributions for the analysis of the landscape designed by the literatura marginal are made with the intention to help future researchers willing to study the theme. Therefore, we have aimed to find the best tools and approaches to handle the contemporary marginal poetics as meaning-producing, taking into consideration its social origin and how it proposes new approaches to the literary national tradition.