Slope stability analyses are usually carried out using deterministic methods, which aim the calculation of a single safety factor assuming the values of the shear strength parameters as representative and fixed. These methods fail to assess the uncertainties in soil properties and do not indicate the proportion of influence that each resistance parameter has on the final value of the safety factor. The probabilistic methods, based on probability, reliability and statistical theories, allow the estimation of the influence of these uncertainties on the deterministic calculations, with the possibility to broadly predict the risk of failure associated with a geotechnical slope stability project. This dissertation studies the application of three probabilistic methods (Monte Carlo, Latin Hypercube, and Alternative Point Estimates) in the evaluation of slope stability, with aid of limit equilibrium methods for the calculation of safety factors. In order to infer the impact of random variables on the estimates of probability and reliability, as well as the importance of an adequate quantification of the standard deviation values, comparisons are made among the results obtained with probabilistic and deterministic methods (limit equilibrium method, finite element method), discussing the main advantages, difficulties and limitations in their application to soil slope stability problems.