The investigation work proposed by this thesis is none other than the objective analysis of the difference between the religious counseling and the psychoanalytical method of the unconscious approach. Yet what may seem simple at first sight leads to mazes and intricacies much more likely to confuse than to clarify the ideas already troubled in the historical moment that passes the humanity. This thesis seeks to prove the importance of the two segments to which it is exposed the human being in an attempt to self-perception, as this operation includes searching for meaning for themselves and each other. So the religion becomes important in any scientific segment based on the principle of the search of the common good, since the contemporaneity did not remove the existential repertory of the human religiosity, which remains inseparable from him. The method developed by Sigmund Freud, notably recognized as one of the methods that are more pointed and influenced the cognitive sciences over almost two centuries, presents, although young as an inspiring source of investigation in the Human Sciences in general. The question which is to be answered is: would be possible a balanced hearing, by the pastoral counseling and psychoanalyst, if both religion and psychoanalysis, formed by the raw material of the unveiling of the meaning of life through thought, could help the maturation of the human being as a person? What would be the possible answers to this question? This research seeks to contribute to the unveiling of these unknowns.