In the hydrothermal energy operation planning of Brazil and other hydro-dependent countries, Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP) computes a risk-averse optimal policy that often considers river-inflow autoregressive models. In practical applications, these models induce an undesirable variability of primal (thermal generation) and dual (marginal cost and spot price) solutions, which are highly sensitive to changes in current inflow conditions. In this work, we propose two differing approaches to stabilize SDDP solutions to the energy operation planning problem: the first approach aims at regularizing primal variables by considering an additional penalty on thermal dispatch revisions over time. The second approach indirectly reduces thermal generation and marginal cost variability by disregarding past inflow information in the cost-to-go function and compensating it with an increase in risk aversion. For comparison purposes, we assess solution quality with a set of proposed indexes summarizing each important aspect of a hydrothermal operation planning policy. In conclusion, we show it is possible to obtain high- quality solutions in comparison to current benchmarks and with significantly reduced variability.