This work presents a comparative study of three techniques for improving the speech recognition rates in adverse environment, namely: Cepstral Mean Normalization (CMN), Spectral Subtraction and Maximum Likelihood Linear Regression (MLLR). They are implemented in two ways: separately and in pairs. The tests are carried out on a simple system: recognition of isolated words (digits from zero to nine, and the word half), speaker-dependent mode, continuous hidden Markov models, and speech feature vectors with twelve cepstral coefficients derived from linear predictive analysis. Three types of noise are considered (the white one, voice babble and from factory) at nine different signal-to-noise ratios. Experimental result demonstrate that it is worth using separately the techniques of robust recognition. This is because for all signal-to-noise conditions when the recognition accuracy is not improved it is the same one obtained when no method for increasing the robustness is applied. Analyzing comparatively the isolated and simultaneous applications of the techniques, it is verified that the later is not always more attractive than the former one. This depends on the pair of techniques. The use of noisy models is also considered. Although it presents better results, it is not feasible to implement in pratical situations. Among the implemented techniques, MLLR presents closer results to the ones obtaneid with noisy models, followed by CMN, and, at last, by Spectral Subtraction. Although the two later ones are beaten by the first, in terms of recognition accuracy, their advantages are the simplicity and the generality. The use of simultaneous techniques reveals that the pair Spectral Subtraction and MLLR is the one with the best performance because it is superior in comparison with the individual use of both methods. This does not happen with other combination of techniques.