The global transformation involving all fields of human interaction in the midst of a democratic context of Western society, has led to a steep increase in demand for justice, a phenomenon named "legalization of life." The judicial response has ceased to be punctual and went on to influence the production of a new order subjective, in that the judicial institution has become the ultimate safe in a world devoid of tradition. In this study, we proposed to study the unfolding of the strand called legalization of family conflicts on the legal actors. When the family undergoes a judicial intervention is expanded its network relational and other characters come to occupy a symbolic place in his universe. The dialectics of human relationships leads us to the idea that all these others are also crossed by the dispute, to the extent that they are still subject and therefore subject to the same fluidity that their litigants. This study investigates the perception of legal actors facing the contemporary family, facing the law and the feelings involved in professional activities. The field study was conducted with ten legal actors, among the categories of judge, prosecutor, lawyer, social worker and psychologist. Results showed conflicting references between the traditional and contemporary, both relative to the family as to the law. His feelings about his own work showed this ambiguity, manifested in various forms, from anguish to the fullness of feeling useful. Our analysis highlights the delicate position of legal actors, in that their sensitivity is sought, but it must be impartial and ethical reflection points as a way forward.