The philosopher Jacques Derrida, who began publishing works in French in the 1960s, made worldly famous the philosophical gesture that would later become known as deconstruction. A highly prolific writer, Derrida claimed that, in a somewhat more or less clear way, his work always posed ethical-political questions to the philosophical tradition he themed. Derrida also acknowledged that it would be equally true to admit that his work posed these questions in a more direct fashion since his 1990 s writings – a moment specialists claim to be defined by an ethical-political turn in his works. This thesis starts from these two statements with the aim of thinking how the gesture of deconstruction, as reporting to ethical-political questions, turns to dislocate the pillars and primacies that apparently frame the thinking forms of this (ethical-political) tradition – thus proposing a significant dislocation of his most basilar perspectives. Very meaningful to these movements are some works such as The monolingualism of the other (1996) and Specters of Marx (1993). With these works – also in contrast with other big references of contemporary political philosophy as Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx – it is possible to think how the way of the so-called deconstruction of re(and dis)-location of political questions allows an opening to new forms of thinking the political. It is from these new forms that this thesis proposes, at the same time, a way of dealing with the legacy of these interlocutors and a manner of restructuring the political questions that comes from deconstruction in a way that they can also might the thinking to place the contemporary political historical questions in a political way. Then, it is possible to think about the crossings between power and possibility, between the might and the mighty, between the impossible and the power/mightytude, the power and the hegemony of power.