The aim of this thesis is to critically analyze uneven geographical development as a movement of capitalist society that involves (re)spatialization, pointing toward alternative possibilities of sociometabolic reproduction in spatialities grounded in difference. Recognizing in uneven geographical development a potential to provide new pathways for the theoretical-conceptual framework of geographical science, we argue that this construction necessitates an update/resignification of its formulations, requiring openness to theoretical and practical contributions beyond Eurocentric and economistic perspectives. Thus, we understand that movement, subversion, and transitoriness are fundamental elements in Marxist frameworks when confronted with the current contradictions inherent to the capitalist production of space, characterized by the reconfiguration of primitive accumulation and new facets of the colonization movement. The need to redefine the analytical scope of geography, which entails understanding the inherent movement in the subject-object relationship, becomes indispensable for reflecting on themes and perspectives previously relegated to the margins. Recovering and elaborating the concept of uneven development seems central to the analysis of spatial transformations in the current moment, as the production of spatial scales and the production of geographical difference become crucial aspects for rethinking subjects and incorporating new meanings to the specific contours that urban space acquires today. Such a reformulation (inextricably tied to thought and action) may offer pathways for projecting alternative geographical developments, grounded in the symphony of differences and the multiple space-temporalities of the urban Other.