How can we understand the marks of difference and the borders that separate who belongs and who doesn t, who is welcome and who isn t, and how they create traces of world dividions and subjectivities? How has this difference been thought of, what frameworks have been used to position various populations in forced migratory displacement, producing a game between a supposed self and a supposed Other? Is it possible to (re)think the problem of difference through the key of intelligibility and movement of deconstruction, of différance? It is within this trajectory and that I intend to construct and translate such a journey of (dis)encounters with the theme from a criting that strives not to repress the aporias and makes use of this census of the very encounters and disagreements that precipitate the following reflections in an effort to contribute to studies on migration and refuge, whether inside or outside the field of knowledge of International Relations. In other words, it is possible move to pay attention to the lines of demarcation, fractures and their undesignable territoriesof lived experiences, as a way of echoing the dimension of the (dis)encounter with the context of refuge, and finding oneself a journey (without pretending to be able to account for it) to be undertaken when talking about, studing and working in the refuge scenario. The lines (whether geographical, dialectical, colonial, racial, among others), of this work lead to and propose some attempts to grasp these facets based on a movement and language of crossing and opening up to diffrent logics, scenarios and theoretical frameworks of contact, not only within the field of International Relations. It s a dialogue that brings together horizons of possibility for thinking about the context of refuge and its borders, demarcations, possibilities, impossibilities and negotiations present in the relationship with difference itself. The lines of this work propose to highlight the relational dimension of research, especially in the encounters and disencounters with the context of refuge – and to (re)consider these subjectivities in displacement, not as substances to be captured, but as radical forms of relationality, which is always at the same time singular and plural, irreducible to an entity presupposed by a totalizing encounter and disagreement – and how to (re)look at this relationship from a point of view of the movement of deconstruciton of this constitutive and ethical (dis)encounter.