The Covid-19 pandemic, decreted in March, 2020 by the World Health Organization, affected various areas of human life, especially in the face of thousads of deaths reported every day by the media. In Brazil, one of the most devastated areas has been the elementary public educational sector. The closing of schools as a sanitary measure made the State Education Departments adopt the emergency remote teaching. In this context, it may be defined as a reorganization of classroom practices to remote methodologies with the use of Digital Technologies (DT) principally. The research that originated this thesis aimed at analyzing the hegemonic meanings of these technologies identified in the discourses of the documents of State Education Departments for remote teaching, found in their websites. The coverage and relevance of these documents enlight convergences related to teachers work, even in different regions of the country and very heterogeneous conditions. In order to analyze the documents, the study applied the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a theoretical approach and method, which defines language as a social practice. Also, it offers models that reveal social inequalities and problems, materialized in the discourse. The study identified as hegemonic meanings of Digital Technologies in those documents the reduction of teaching and learning process to the simple sharing of contents through apps and platforms; technological solucionism – a well founded critic to the concept of technology as a solution for everything – and the DT as tools or ideology-free objects. With the difficulties in the access to equipments for remote teaching, this thesis also concludes that Digital Technologies, hegemonically understood as the solution to keep teaching and learning process during the pandemic, captures public educational sectors and expropriate teachers work, while they deepen inequalities in the acess to Education.