The debate about the relation between real exchange rates and economic growth, even though old in the academics circle, grew strongly with the Asian experience of fast economic growth and the maintenance of low levels of real exchange rates. Recently, studies have shown that undervaluation of the real exchange rate until some level could have positive impact on growth, while overvaluations are thought to (always) have negative relation with economic performance. We will argue in this work that these results fail to take into consideration the dynamics of a third variable: the country`s savings rate. First we show theoretical evidence that countries with higher savings rate will have a more devalued real exchange rate and at the same time, will show higher productivity growth rates. Secondly, we present an empirical analysis of 80 countries during the period from 1970 to 2004, were we calculate the equilibrium real exchange rate including the savings rate as one of its fundamentals, and after that, we estimate the relation between the real exchange rate deviation from its equilibrium level and economic growth. The regression analysis shows us that the real exchange rate misalignment is not correlated at all with a country`s economic performance. We conclude that policies that stimulate the savings decision are much more important for growth than the deviations of the exchange rate that does not reflect the economy`s fundamentals.