In the last 45 years were published many articles referring to shale pore pressure prediction, due to the necessity of optimizing the constructive process of petroleum wells. In this work shows up a view of the pore pressure prediction methods with its advantages and disadvantages, with its strong points and its critics, with its hits and failures, trying to explain the causes of the differences between the predicted values and the real ones. As result of the bibliographical revision, we obtained a historical of the pore pressure prediction, furthermore gathering the principal mechanisms of generation of pore pressures and mechanisms of lateral variation of the same. Also, were described 12 methods of pore pressure prediction, the Centroid concept, 3 techniques to detect unloading of effective tensions in a rock formation, and a description of the use of the seismic in the pore pressure prediction. The Eaton (1975) and the Bowers (1995) methods were applied with the objective to discuss the uncertainties in the parameters of each model, this was complemented with sensibility analysis. As result of the existent uncertainties, we applied a probabilistic analyze, based on the Monte Carlo simulation and using the Eaton´s method, with the aim to present results within confidence intervals and to allow contingency plans during the well construction project. Finally, the results of a 3D pore pressure prediction using the Eaton model and the Bowers Trend, were assessed. The data cubes were obtained by weighted space interpolation using well logs at the same basin. We concluded that the results from this type of analysis can be used such as qualitative purposes, obtaining pore pressure gradients cubes, where can be observed bigger and lesser risk zones.