The dignity of the human person is one of the foundations that every State must safeguard and preserve. The unjust violation of its elements irrevocably results in moral damage that leads to reimbursement of the victim, with the purpose of restoring the situation prior to the occurrence of the damage, putting him or her again in full enjoyment of the rights that were injured. In the case of Brazil, moral damages have regulated economic reparations constitutionally, but their interpretation and judicial application, in some cases, do not respond to the existing doctrinal and constitutional criteria, given the high values set as compensation and the nonobservance of elements that make up liability. In Cuba, human dignity is constitutionally recognized as the foundation of the state, being the first law in the system; nevertheless, when the offense of its elements occurs, its reparation is limited to the public retraction of the offender, not finding the economic repair as a legitimate option to reimburse the moral damage occasioned, thus making scarce the protection of the individual and the applicability of the moral damage. The difficulties presented by the two countries can be overcome by assessing the legal systems as a whole, seeking the reparation of extra-judicial damages from the perspective of civil-constitutional law, and in Cuba it is possible to obtain economic reparation for the off-balance-sheet damage justified by the laws and institutions that make up the system; and in the case of Brazil, in addition to pecuniary reparation, it is possible to adopt the public retraction of the offender as a possibility inserted in the right of reply.