The theme of teaching authorship remains tied to an instrumental bias, related to distance education or to the teacher s performance for the use of technologies or the elaboration of didactic material.The focus of this research is then on authorship as an ethical-aesthetic act, especially the authorship of poetic texts as artistic and literary production. This work aims to investigate what the narratives of a group of teachers regarding their constitution as poet teachers and what elements of reflection their texts and narratives can provide to think about authorship and poetry in school. It seeks to verify what conceptions of poetry the poets researched bring with them and to know how poetry is made present in the teaching practice of these teachers, as well as to identify experiences with the poetry that affected the subjects researched and that can serve as reflection to think about authorship and poetry at school. Mikhail Bakhtin is the main theoretical and methodological reference of this study.The reflections developed by the philosopher of language, especially the themes focused on a philosophy of otherness, make up the basic foundation and guide the theoretical-methodological course adopted in the research. Other authors whose reflections supported this study are Paul Celan, Christopher Tezza, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Roger Chartier, Sir Ken Robinson.The qualitative research is anchored in a methodology marked by narrative bias, in which researched subject and researcher narrate their experiences in order to construct meanings in a web of meanings that collectively will be (through) weaving through the narratives and poems of the constituent subjects of the study, as a network. The data of the research were collected from two main methodological procedures: online questionnaires and autobiographical narratives, in a seam that aims to take on the dialogic form of poetic voices that, together, make up a necklace of poetry, art and resistance, which brings up voices and silenced cries, beads of the memories of the professed poets of the poets, voices that put themselves in dialogue and, united, stitch senses.The information seized in teachers statements offers elements that lead to relevant ways of reflection, such as the process of reader-author formation, human relations that permeate the practices of formation, as well as the place of affection and sensitivity in the constitution of meaningful learning. From the reports of the teachers and the analyzes undertaken, the importance of the development of an education for sensibility, in which multiplicity of readings, metaphorization, imagination, creativity, divergent thinking, and indispensable components are potentiated to an ethical and aesthetic action that interrogates reality critically and creatively.The research points out that work with poetry in school becomes fundamental in that it is able to sharpen sensitivity, creativity, ethical and aesthetic aspects, the expansion of critical-reflexive thinking and the acquisition of new forms of empowerment through the liberating power of the word. Research has led to the conclusion that authorship is a form of resistance and poetry is a manifestation of resistance against the reification of man and a form of in (ter) venation in the world, providing for the non-anesthetization of the senses.